Comment: Do you not see...

(See in situ)


Do you not see...

society did change. In 1973 the Supreme Court said it could not determine when life began. That allowed for the murder of the preborn to the tune of 50 million. I am not sure how old you are, but they used to do saline abortions where children were litterly burned inside the mother before being aborted.

You said: "Obviously, a 2 year old is exempt from the "potential human" clause (despite being a pain sometimes). That seems to be the same "straw man" I used myself earlier. ;) "

I am not making that up look here: http://www.prisonplanet.com/read-it-and-weep-how-obama%E2%80...

And here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/post/afte...

and here: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ethicists-argue-in-favor-of-...

and here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2060118/posts

and here: http://www.blogicus.com/archives/post_birth_abortions.php

Look at this conversation from the DP back in Oct http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/2804353 : “The question then is what is the defining characteristic of a human being. The answer which makes sense to me is a living organism which possesses a volitional, conceptual consciousness. It is arguable that even a newborn baby does not yet possess that!” –galtgulch

It is a disgusting proposition even more so now that those who have deemed themselves as persons are now wanting to determine who can join their “personhood club.” Origin of life has been moved from an objective argument to one which is subjective. Subject to a myriad of litmus tests: http://www.alzheimer-europe.org/DE/Ethics/Definitions-and-ap...

I am telling you, the debate is no longer conception. The debate is who is actually human. If we don't protect life at the start, we will not protect life after it has started.

That is WHY Ron Paul said: "Unless we understand…we must protect life, we cannot protect liberty."

Can you see that society changes?

...