Paul is opposed to abortion and supports a Human Life Amendment and a Life at Conception Act. He also opposes abortion in cases of rape and incest, but supports use of the morning-after pill. He opposes federal funding for abortion. He takes a states' rights position, favoring the overturn of Roe v. Wade and allowing states to decide on the legality of abortions without federal involvement.
Ron Paul's Sanctity of Life Act was to give the States BACK the right to protect preborn children as some had done prior.
I see what you are saying about Rand's Bill. Since he is seeking constitutional protection of the preborn according the 14th amendment. However the 14th amendment specifically says "born" so I don't know how that will work out.
I have to be honest, today is the first time I read Rand's Bill. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s91/text Thanks to your challenge. I am good with it though. I am good with preborn human life being given the protection of the constitution just like you and I enjoy. However the constitution specifically says BORN:
"1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws" http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am14.html