Comment: The longer presentation is better

(See in situ)


The longer presentation is better

One thing that bothers me though. He fails to link the giants to the elaborate stone structures. All accounts of the giants discovery presented just alludes to earthen mounds, i.e. typical indian burial mounds.
That's very interesting about the copper mine. There must have been trade routes all over that used the copper.

Why is all this being covered up. This is bedrock proof of a very intelligent large civilization. There were cities of these people in N America. IMO, I think they were of the Mayan variety.

Also, why is the Smithsonian hiding all the evidence of these giants? And the true nature of the mounds?

We've been lied to. Our history books are junk. Somebody has been in the shadows trying to re-write the actual history for a long time.