the article calls out judge Napolitano for saying it is "setting up religious leaders as the heads of the country." and trys to discredit him by saying it has all of these protections of personal liberty.
it also is nice enough to provde a link to the enlgish translation of their proposed consitition. It does indeed outline those personal liberties.
But... down in Article 82 it says "The legislative power shall consist of the House of Representatives and the Shura Council."
Wikipedia Shura Council.
Turns out, Judge Napolitano called it. "setting up religious leaders as the heads of the country."
that's not to say the whole thing is terrible and should be thrown out, but you also cant say Judge Nap is a lair either.