Comment: Yes...

(See in situ)


Yes...

It would be far better for him to continue to extort money from the Liberty Movement at a rate of 83% of whatever we're dumb enough to give him.

People's responses to this have been absolutely amazing. Why are you defending this guy? No one is saying (now, at least) anything about how good he is at helping the cause (he's terrible at it). They're saying he took 83 percent of the money given to him to help Ron Paul. That's atrocious. It's indefensible. And your response is that you "wish we could pay him a full professional fee"? What does that even mean, that you wish we could demand he give back a bunch of money and only keep a professional fee?