The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Would I be here?
Would I be here?
Would I be here if Ron said as president that he'd continue to fund social security and medicare even though it's unconstitutional? Yes. Would I agree with Ron that political will needs to be ammassed to change such things? Yes. Would Rand Paul as president be a huge step in ammassing the political will to bring the troops home and shrink the government? Yes. So I don't know what your issue is. Ron himself said he'd still fund unconstitutional things simply because we need to take the steps to change things. We can't simply be purists to the point that we can't form the coalitions of influence required to make those changes.
Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).