Maybe someone can answer this for me...
Gary mentions in the video that Peter's $150K donation was spent on Google ads and so it isn't an independent expenditure. Maybe I'm missing something here but how does this makes sense? If the Google ads were actually spent in advocacy for Ron Paul they would have to be included as an independent expenditure right? But they are not listed as an independent expenditure - so what were the ads for?
Again I may be missing something here. I'm not an FEC lawyer but this doesn't sound right to me.
Breaking news and analysis from the liberty perspective
Find me on Tsu: https://www.tsu.co/Trevor
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators