The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: they are not contradictions
they are not contradictions
they are simply two of the last phrases he said then he died it doesnt mean anything except that luke focuses on one phrase and john on another. eye witness accounts are often proven to be true because different people point out different things that they saw, in fact the best way to tell people are lying about an eye witness account is by having them say the same exact things, so two different people seeing different things during the same scene actually proves authenticity.
You need to define flawless and perfect. The Bible even though it contains history and eye witness accounts is not a history book, every word is in there for a reason, you could say all the fat has been cut out.
Basically the phrase about not knowing Gods name is found through out the old testiment and it is always referring to people not knowing a characteristic of God.