The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I understand what you are saying, Do you think laws against
I understand what you are saying, Do you think laws against
crime are a deterrent? I ask because you said: "Calling the police did not prevent the homicide in your example. The punishment is irrelevant at that point."
Perhaps not for the dead person, but for continuance of "civilization" it is still relevant?
I understand that murderers are going to murder, but would there be more murder if there were no civil consequences?
I appreciate your time to give your perspective. Thanks :)
Replies to this comment: