The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Smash was wrong initally. The
Smash was wrong initally. The
Smash was wrong initally. The law does make detention of us citizens illegal. To me, this was the clear intent of Congress. On the flip side, courts could use the rejection of the language of Rand's amendment coupled with an inventive reading of the new amendment new to say that all congress intended was to restrict indefinite detention other than that authorized by 2012 NDAA. This would be blatantly wrong but a possibility. This is why sometimes attaching amendments that sound good but will not pass can be dangerous because courts sometimes view them as a rejected interpretation of the new law.
Ventura 2012