















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer


Comment: I'm not a christian
I'm not a christian
but I agree with you. Looking at it from a libertarian prospective, it's hard to see how killing a fetus doesn't count as aggression. furtheremore; treating an unborn fetus as a "tresspasser" requires a certain amount of mental gymnastics that, frankly, I cannot relate to.
Last time I checked an undeveloped fetus can't leave under it's own power. What especially bothers me is that in most cases the child was "Invited in" with this prior knowledge. Almost no one in the developed world is ignorant to the fact that sex = childbirth. To me there's an implicit contract that you will take care of the child until they can look after themselves or by someone else.
I get that for alot of people ( yourself included ) it's a moral issue. What fascinates me is that people constantly claim that the legal side of the issue is unclear. If you accept the non-agression principle I don't see how it's not a clear-cut violation. But that's just me.
Btw, the cases of rape or the mother being endangered are a red herring. These are a vanishingly small percentage of abortions that take place.
- Liberty and Prosperity -
Replies to this comment: