















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Here's what PANDA (People
Here's what PANDA (People
Here's what PANDA (People Against the NDAA) have to say about all the amendments to the 2013 NDAA.
The version that passed, that Rand voted for, contains the Feinstein-Lee Amendment.
I STRONGLY suggest everyone read this analysis, and actually go read the bill that passed. It's not good, and NOT something Ron Paul would have voted for.
Rand should not have voted for this bill. He should have introduced his dad's idea (to eliminate the offending section entirely) and NOT COMPROMISE on something so important as the MILITARY INDEFINITELY DETAINING ANYONE.
It's hard to believe we are even having this discussion. Do we believe in Liberty, or not here??
https://pandaunite.org/ndaa-2013-ndaa-amendmentschanges-are-...
Replies to this comment: