Comment: if you are correct, then I apologize

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: The down votes don't bury a thread (see in situ)

if you are correct, then I apologize

I seem to be doing a lot of that on this board!

I actually was coming back to edit my post and remove some of the inflammatory language, which was unnecessary and mainly just makes me look bad, but it doesn't look like I can do that now. :-{

Thank you for letting me know that the down votes down suppress the post. So it is only a lack of new comments which moves the a new thread higher or lower?

BTW, for what it is worth, I am still willing to look at new perspectives on the WTC 7 building. I have the same problem with people who won't look at one side of an argument as I do with people who won't look at another. I don't have a problem with people who finally decide they don't care enough to continue putting time and energy into a debate (that the investment isn't worth the possibility of new learning) as there are always more things to learn and do than there is time to learn and do them. (My argument about the Illuminati, UFOs, etc. ... the reality or unreality is likely unprovable but is substantially irrelevant in my bigger picture. But the time investment in engaging further is real enough and has a real cost ... it costs me valuable time in promoting the future I would LIKE to create for myself and others).

Bill of Rights /Amendment X: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Do you need a politician or judge to "interpret" those 28