















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.


Comment: Questionable experimental design
Questionable experimental design
After reading the report http://kdvr.com/2012/05/16/your-questions-answered-driving-u... and seeing this video, I am a bit confused on how they did this experiment and doubt their results mean anything.
In this kind of experiment you need a control group. So either we need to know the results of these people driving on the simulator before smoking weed or there needs to be a group of people who do not get the treatment/marijuana intake. If they tested these people on their driving skills before the treatment, then we need to know whether they passed or not. If they did not pass when sober then obviously they will not likely pass if they are intoxicated. Therefore, without the control group results, saying that the treatment group did not pass this simulated test does not mean a whole lot, especially if the simulator had problems.
Anyway, I am surprised about how long that stuff stays in your system.