Comment: Question:

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Careful folks, (see in situ)

Question:

So this General's recorded speech on 9/11 "truths" tells you he's controlled opposition? How can he be controlled if he is advocating throwing the NIST report out of the window? I guess he wants you to think 9/11 is an inside job so he can confuse us?

Let's get right to the chase: what part of this recording was false in regards to the 9/11 truth movement? What piece of information did that General say that is not true? That's all i want to know, regardless of any affiliations of his or his wife's.

Lima-1, out.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.