The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: We are both in a position to judge the facts.
We are both in a position to judge the facts.
That is, if they are indeed true.
Supposed facts:
X killed thousands of babies without mercy
X killed thousands of pregnant women without mercy
X killed thousands of men, women, and children without mercy
X killed thousands of animals without mercy
X spared thousands of virgins for use by his minions
Conclusion:
No matter what good things I now told about X, you would still have sufficient information to decide whether X is merciful or not if that was the question put to you. You would, as I would also.
Furthermore if we both know X very well, we now have the alternative to simply reject all of the above facts as false. We understand that this information all comes from dubious hearsay sources and is not valid. That makes for a completely different judgement to be rendered, IMO.