The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Sigh
Sigh
Wow. Guys, you realize that molecules aren't the same as their constituent elements right?
Like this is basic chemistry.
HF isn't on the periodic table of elements. Fluorine and Hydrogen Fluoride aren't the same thing. The same way Oxygen and Hydrogen Dioxide (water) aren't the same thing.
If they can't get even these basic chemical facts right, then how are we supposed to trust the rest of the document? Fluorine and Hydrogen Fluoride are completely different. I honestly can't even think of a single thing they have in common. Both are nonflammable gases? That's about all I can think of.
One's an oxidizer... one isn't. One reacts with water, one doesn't. One will completely devour glass or concrete, one won't.
Am I missing something here? The author in the document mentions that he may be talking about fluoride, and then goes on to cite a bunch of historical incidents involving Fluorine instead of Fluoride.
Eric Hoffer
http://gplus.to/jamesrmoore
Replies to this comment: