The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Biblical scholarship
Biblical scholarship
has practically dismissed these passages and others in all modern English versions of the bible since 1880. ALL modern translation use Greek manuscripts based on codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. They are different then what the KJV is translated from. That is why there are so many differences between the modern versions and the KJV.
Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are fourth century documents. They are considered the oldest complete manuscripts in existence. They are hailed as the best and most accurate. It is these two manuscripts that are referenced when you hear bible scholars say the best and most accurate manuscripts don't have such and such.
Google them. Here are afew to get you started.
http://www.scionofzion.com/vaticanus_sinaiticus.htm
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/vaticanus.html
This one covers your original question: http://www.chick.com/information/bibleversions/articles/king...
Hope this helped
Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Replies to this comment: