Comment: Nope

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Well at the risk of (see in situ)


Not having trouble with anything, it is what it is !
(The squirrels are the ones that think Rand has a chance of gaining the republican nomination.
I think most people are fed up already with these Rand for 2016 fact finding missions.) So whats your strategy genius ?
Is it 'most people'? Or 'some people' which is it ?, you seem to be confused and contradicting yourself already, why is that?..
I also find it funny that you call the poll dubious ( which is a understatement btw ,the poll is nowhere near accurate as it can be manipulated in many different ways) then you proceed to court the results in your desperation to prove something. The reason they get so many down votes is because they are clearly the minority in here as the poll results are complete BS.
I'm not interested in changing these Rand bashing Dolts minds, clearly they know it all already and are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things anyway as they are the 1% minority and are content with losing elections and getting nothing done.
Rand is gaining ground regardless of what they think and looking at the potential list of possible candidates that share our goals,AGAIN he is by far the best chance we have to get where we want to be and MOST of us know this but oddly enough YOU and a 'few' others do not. Perhaps you can enlighten us on who it is that shares our goals that has as good or better chance of winning the nomination than Rand ? You made that comment, not me and it is what it is, you should at least explain. How about answering some questions instead of asking them all the time and making your smug comments? ...and try not to contradict yourself while doing so...
I'll be waiting for your 'dubious'
i will leave this conversation at that sir genius....

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams