Comment: I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night...

(See in situ)


I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night...

So often, when discussing the subject of how WTC7 (and even the other two towers) fell; heat from fires as a result of the jets crashing into the two buildings (and the subsequent fires in some of the other buildings) vs. controlled demolition, whether it be on discussion boards such as this one or videos that I’ve watched, people that maintain the position that the only way the buildings (especially WTC7) could have fallen was through controlled demolition (and we keep hearing the word “thermite” from that crowd), will cite their own professional background as proof that they know what they are talking about. This particular discussion is a good example of that. There have been people in this discussion that post comments citing their background in such a way as to demonstrate their own expertise and how it helps them to conclude, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that WTC7 was taken down by controlled demolitions. I’ve seen people say things like “I’m a construction worker” or “work in commercial refrigeration” or “I was a CPO in the Navy” (without citing his exact training or type of work I might add). And, here’s my point to this post: All of you that say stupid stuff like this sound like you’re really saying “I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night”. For those that can’t figure out what I mean, simply put, you have no valid friggin’ life experience to pronounce with assurance that WTC7 was a controlled demolition. Stop making yourself look like stupid little children!

My first post expressed the opinion that it is certainly possible that the Federal Government is culpable but that they did not plan and execute the operation. I maintain the position that airplanes caused the fires that took the buildings down and that those airplanes were hijacked by people OUTSIDE of the U.S. Government. The feds may have gotten word of the plan and helped to ensure it’s success by planning “training” operations and diverting military assets and by purposely “bumbling” the tracking of the hijackers but, my theory does NOT involve demolitions planted in the buildings and it does not involve U.S. Government agents ACTIVELY participating. What is my training/expertise/professional background that makes me so sure of this? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! I possess NO skills/training/knowledge having to do with explosives, thermite, construction, mechanical engineering, physics, or anything else that might be applicable. What skills DO I possess? Critical thinking, logic, reasoning, and common sense. That’s all the skills necessary to arrive at my theory after having examined evidence and listened to highly knowledgeable people discuss the issue.

So, in summary, for those of you calling into question my training/skills/knowledge and citing your own, you are all full of shit, know nothing about what you speak of, and make yourself sound terminally stupid. Remember, you sound like you’re saying “I stayed at a Holiday In Express last night”….