Right, but calling it a paradox is a model of it's own. It's not remaining neutral on the mystery of God. Calling it a paradox is saying there is no mystery, it's saying that it is undeniably illogical, unreasonable, self refuting, and inconsistent. That sounds like a hazard to me. Wouldn't you feel safer just calling it incomprehensible instead of a logical paradox? Besides, The Trinity being 3 persons and 1 substance doesn't even fall into the category of paradox, they are not mutually exclusive concepts.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This si