















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ro


Comment: Your response is bizarre and
Your response is bizarre and
Your response is bizarre and incoherent. I have only copied my own response (once) to another post with this same subject.
You can find an answer to your demand that I "prove" unions have had no impact on wages (not a claim I've made or would make) or resulted in safer work places in the Tom DiLorenzo article I linked above: http://mises.org/daily/1590
He's written more on unionism, as have Tom Woods and Gary North (http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/who-benefits-from-labor-unions/), and Woods even has a long talk where he deflates a lot of the mythology about how unions saved us all from greedy capitalists (http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/beware-the-free-market-exploita...).
Now, you don't have to believe these gentlemen or agree with their analysis, but don't post as if I've not offered a response.
As for your yammering about how I wet my pants and have an agenda, well, what a great argument. You got me there.
I'm not sure why you've repeatedly seemed to take offense at being taken for a union apologist when pretty much all you've done here is post a lot of the same BS claims unions make about themselves.