Comment: I have a PhD in Chemical Engineering

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Just (see in situ)

I have a PhD in Chemical Engineering

My background does give me some credibility to evaluate some of the assertions made by Prof. Jones. The paper does not prove the existence of nanothermite, nor does it prove the existence of molten metal. The data in the paper do not support the conclusions drawn by Prof. Jones. The journal itself is a very poor one, and Prof. Jones does not have the technical expertise to evaluate the data. The study would not have been published in any serious peer reviewed journal.

If you go back and read my old posts in your vetting of me as a government agent, you will see that I was supportive of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. The NIST WTC7 study should be published, the video tapes at the Pentagon should be released, debris should have been saved for proper forensic study, etc. There is a lot of secrecy surrounding 9/11 that is strange to say the least. However, I am a scientist and an engineer. I want to see hard data. I understand that the absence of data results in people drawing their own conclusions, but you should at least realize that is what you are doing.

Of course, anyone can log in here and claim to be whatever, so you won't believe me. You already have your mind made up anyway, so proceed to downvote my post into invisibility.

We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive.

-C. S. Lewis