The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: You have to "read into" a persons "implications"

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: It's the implication that ads (see in situ)

You have to "read into" a persons "implications"

what he actually said was clear "He (as the consumer), does not want ads" -- He didn't say, "I don't want you to make a profit," what he was saying was "he" will not watch/read if there are ads -- that IS consumer-will.

Now if he formed a union of voters to block ads via gov't fiat, then he would be a socialist -- voting and lobbying (now that's socialism friend).