Comment: The "evidence" you show is as worthy of review as any

(See in situ)

The "evidence" you show is as worthy of review as any

You are correct, truthers can sometimes get a bit rude about it all but non-truthers do the same thing.
Do you have anything that explains why the central core columns in buildings 1 & 2 didn't stay standing? Everything I've seen discusses how floors can pancake and fall in a perfectly symmetrical manner but I never see anyone explain how the massive core columns disintegrated while the floors were detaching themselves from them.
A good explanation of that and I'm willing to at least consider that perhaps 3 buildings fell into their own footprints that day. Why do non-truthers not discuss how incredibly anomalous that is? I'd like to see someone honestly explain how such an anomaly occurred 3 times that one day.