Comment: It does violate the non-aggression principle...

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: lets restate this, FOOD (see in situ)

It does violate the non-aggression principle...

...but it is not socialism. If you define every State violation of the NAP as socialism, the term loses all meaning. You can say it's socialistic, or it has the same logic as socialism, but it's dishonest (attempt at guilt by association) to call it socialism.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."