The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not


Comment: Yes, an anarchist would be
Yes, an anarchist would be
Yes, an anarchist might be opposed to any law pushed through any government mechanism whatsoever including a popular vote. An anarchist would NOT, however, be opposed to a private arbitrator ruling that a business must label its product where the product might cause damage to the consumer without the consumer's knowledge of the products contents. If the arbitrator was applying common-law, then the arbitrator's decision SHOULD mirror the common-principles of the people which in turn would mirror a popular vote.
So its a distinction of form and not substance that isn't really the point of the debate. The anarchist who made the video chose to make it about form.
Ventura 2012