Comment: I understand now.

(See in situ)


fireant's picture

I understand now.

You have a poor grasp of the English language.
I wrote,
"The implications of there being controlled demolition, missiles, remote controlled planes, or any of the other theories are utterly astounding. It would mean thousands of agency employees have knowingly falsified documents, radar tracks, radio communications, flight recorder data, hundreds of photos. It just goes on and on the amount of falsification required for these theories to be true."
"Implications" in that context is well defined as the amount of evidence which would have to be falsified, yet you somehow equate it with access to the building? I was clearly not referring in any way with "how" the deed was done.
And you can use dismissive phrases such as "people like you" all you wish. It does not change the fact all structural evidence clearly shows structural failure.

Undo what Wilson did