Comment: Thanks for the videos

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Proof (see in situ)

Thanks for the videos

I only listened to the relevent parts (the first 8 minutes of the second video before he goes on to talk about other incidences, the second half of the first video), but I don't really see how this shows that there are 3 or even 2 shooters. Someone in a crisis situation thinks they see two shadows and reports it. Then the police see someone or more than one person running toward them. In the first video there is a picture of a guy running into the woods who the police chase. A boy sees a man handcuffed on the ground outside the school.

Is it really that surprising that the police were arresting any adult males who was running away from the scene? Would you, as an unarmed person, stick around during a shooting? How is this real evidence that there were more than one shooter?