The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: First,
First,
my experience is anti gun people are emotional with little or no ability to think critically or logically. Pro gun people tend to be more logical in their thinking while putting emotions on the back burner.
I read a comment the other day somewhere which stated all guns should be banned and only the police and military should have them. I of course pointed out that the opined solution was exactly what the second amendment was meant to protect us against. I then posed the question, "if all guns are banned, why would the police need them?"
I was hoping the poster would attempt an answer so I could point out the flaws of his emotional illogical mindset, but nothing yet.
Replies to this comment: