The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Yeah, good point.
Yeah, good point.
I do not know exactly how they calculated the temperature but they used the air bubbles.
Since 1850 the co2 concentration has exponentially increased from 320 to 380.
http://www.ems.psu.edu/~radovic/CO2_increase.gif
And burning hydrocarbons results in increased co2 concentrations. But if some or most charts depict co2 lagging temperature than I am not sure what to think of it. Also, every article I read has an agenda. They either are trying to prove global warming or deny it. So the information is hard to trust.
Here is a nice chart showing the relationship during the industrial period. There is no way to tell what is lagging on it.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/co2_temp_1900_2008.gif
So I am still left in purgatory not knowing if global warming is a scare tactic used to scare the population into being taxed and controlled more.