Comment: Why can one not remain a

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: My research shows that this (see in situ)

Why can one not remain a

Why can one not remain a "Person" (member of the original "People") while claiming against the UNITED STATES claims to you as chattel property without your consent at birth? Are they claiming that your parents gave up your sovereignty at birth with a certificate? That would seem impossible?

As a member of the "People" is it legal for the government to also set up your NAME through the birth certificate as a Corporation simultaneously and without your consent?

Very interesting... I would be interested to see the results of test cases in practice as a legal layman. Any supreme court examples?

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.” ― Henry Ford.