















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.


Comment: How many pilots have to say "That is impossible?"
How many pilots have to say "That is impossible?"
A lesson in language:
A LAW can NOT be broken. Codes and regulations can, but Natural Laws may be temporarily defied, but not broken. Can you disobey gravity? Physics? Aerodynamics?
I am not an expert, but when experts tell me "That is impossible" I try to understand. There are many pilots who have given detailed explanations of why the Pentagon could NOT have been a plane as large as the one that supposedly hit the Pentagon.
What happened? How the hell am I supposed to know? All I know is the "official story" does not hold water. I have seen MANY shots of airplane crashes and NEVER have I seen the plane disintegrate. Well, except on 9-11, when steal frame building ceased to be able to withstand fire, too.
A correction: Natural Laws cannot be broken, except on 9-11 by "terrorists."
This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...