The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: where did i define
where did i define
anything in my post?
my point was,they cannot do away with the 2nd
but as we have seen,they have regulations on it
did i say this was right or wrong? no,as it wasn't my point
but THEY can make the projectiles we call bullets,shells
aka ammo scarce
so while we STILL have the 2nd intact,it would not matter
as we wouldn't be able to FIND the ammo for them arms
clear enough for you now?
Replies to this comment: