The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Right to Arms = Right to Self-Defense
Right to Arms = Right to Self-Defense
It's as simple as that.
The right to guns is an extension of the right to self-defense.
I'll choose my method of self-defense and others can choose their own, thank you very much.
Anyone who is against self-defense is in favor of people being victims of rape, robbery, and murder.
As I wrote in another post:
Let's let the liberals explain why THEY are IN FAVOR of more crime.
Let them defend their position that they want MORE victims of rape, robbery, and murder.
I do NOT need to explain myself beyond self-defense. Are they AGAINST self-defense? Yes, they are if they are trying to stop people from defending themseselves. Why do they want MORE violent crime? Do they LIKE people being VICTIMS?
Put it back on them. They are the ones INITIATING FORCE against others. They are the ones who are acting and advocating IMMORAL ideas.
Replies to this comment: