Comment: More than likely someone views chemtrails as CT

(See in situ)

More than likely someone views chemtrails as CT

Someone knee-jerk associates chemtrails with CT ('conspiracy' theory), and therefore rejects the possibility that governments are already spraying chemical compounds in the atmosphere.

Never mind that this is public science, that many documents and patents have been filed, that major government and scientific conferences have been and are being held on it, and that substantial evidence from soil samples in suspected areas tends to confirm it.

It is not being discussed openly in mainstream media.


It is not publicly / socially accepted by the average person.

Therefore (it 'logically' follows):

It is extremely unlikely, an outlandish theory, is bad for ones reputation to acknowledge as being credible, and therefore must be rejected as ridiculous CT ('conspiracy') in order to maintain public reputability.

Does that about cover it?