who think that voting and lobbying beget individualism -- it is logically and mathematically impossible outcome.
I'm talking about "ballot box voting"
Voting is an abdication of Consumer-Rule
Lobbying is bribery (the purchase of said politicians future voting trends)
Voting is a non-free-market good.
A free-market is consumer-sovereignty (according to Mises)
You cannot have both consumer-sovereignty AND abdication of consumer-sovereignty -- You either rule as a consumer or you are ruled-over.
THEREFORE -- It does not matter what Piers Morgan or the NRA says -- they are both wrong because their solution is to run back to gov't force.
Gun Owners want Gov't to "protect their rights" -- Libs want to protect their rights to kill-unborn -- Repubs and Dems love to kill Brown people and don't stand in their wary (it's their "right").
In a free-market there is only ONE "right" -- You have the right to protect yourself, if un-able your family or friends can "chose" to protect you, or you have the right to die (quickly or slowly).
The "right" to self-defense in all it's possible iterations.
Also -- Only you defend your "right" to self-defense in a free-society; there's no group who judges or certifies.
In a free-society the only time your one-right is threatened is when your about to be shot, stabbed, bludgeoned, set ablaze, blown up, hung, drawn and quartered, put on the rack -- etc etc.
If you make one right after this one you begin perpetual voting, perpetual side-taking, and thus perpetual war.
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: