The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: i guess i looked at it differently
i guess i looked at it differently
the scotus sure doesn't have the track record of holding our rights dear,afterall they went from upholding to interpreting,even going so far as violating the const without losing any sleep over it
that patriot act was not supposed to be used on americans,but i have seen people jailed for filming them,and citing that act as their guide
i am one of them people who quivers ever time they open their yaps
might be from them saying,you have no standing in court if you haven't been personally affected by it yet(instead of them saying,this law/act does not line up with the const,so therefor has no standing
deacon
Replies to this comment: