Comment: Language usage

(See in situ)

Language usage

Calling them "assault rifles" is only accurate for those who use these weapons in a manner of committing aggression against the Natural Rights of others.

Of course statists and gun-grabbers would use this term. Why would those who believe in rational self-defense?

If you own a quality firearm of this sort, and do not have any aims of committing an assault on your fellow man, how is it an "assault rifle"? A weapon does not define intent.

This would be like calling hammers "murder hammers".

In the hands of good people, these sorts of rifles are "Self-Defense Rifles" not "Assault Rifles".


Freedom - Peace - Prosperity