Calling them "assault rifles" is only accurate for those who use these weapons in a manner of committing aggression against the Natural Rights of others.
Of course statists and gun-grabbers would use this term. Why would those who believe in rational self-defense?
If you own a quality firearm of this sort, and do not have any aims of committing an assault on your fellow man, how is it an "assault rifle"? A weapon does not define intent.
This would be like calling hammers "murder hammers".
In the hands of good people, these sorts of rifles are "Self-Defense Rifles" not "Assault Rifles".
Freedom - Peace - Prosperity
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: