Comment: Monopoly False Fronts

(See in situ)


Monopoly False Fronts

"When the founders of America wrote the constitution, including the bill of rights, they wanted to make it very clear for the layman to comprehend."

Look here:

http://www.amazon.com/Other-Founders-Anti-Federalism-Dissent...

The Myth about how The Constitution was anything other than organized crime made legal ought to be stopped dead in its tracks, and no longer having so many duped supporters providing the means by which we suffer, which is an abject belief in falsehood without question.

This is a Nation State, Communist Style (was communist styled before the communists copied the style) Involuntary Government EXACTLY where it is crime made legal.

If a Carl Miller, or any other free man, or woman, knows all the information required to fight the Legal Crime Game according to all the Legal Crime Rules (Admiralty or whatever you want to call it), then the OP opening words are false:

"When the founders of America wrote the constitution, including the bill of rights, they wanted to make it very clear for the layman to comprehend."

That is patently absurd. The layman does not know, nor does the OP appear to know, that The Constitution was written by criminals so as to be CONSTRUCTED to mean anything the criminals want it to mean, and that means that it is a LIE, and what do you think happens when the constructors of lies are challenged on their lies?

One lie becomes two, and two become four, and four become sixteen, and in no time there are so many lies that there are not enough libraries to store all the lies that intend to cover up the first one.

Carl Miller's are the exceptions, by a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong way exceptional compared to the layman.

It may be a good idea to move closer to the exceptions, sure, but the parroting of more lies just covers up the lies better, so why do it?

Joe