















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I Agree With You...
I Agree With You...
... but you must look at the facts. Amash tried to pass a really radical amendment in the House and look where it went, nowhere. Rand Paul saw that and realized that the NDAA was going to pass anyway so he decided that this bill would at least make more Americans more aware of indefinite detention even if the title isn't exactly law. And by the way, one question I would like to ask everyone before they down-vote me. If this amendment really did nothing to protect us from indefinite detention then why did McCain, Graham and Levin spend so much time defending the bill when this amendment was taken out?
Follow me on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/DanielZ4Freedom
Replies to this comment: