The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: You're right, it is not any

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: The timestamps are meaningless. (see in situ)

You're right, it is not any

You're right, it is not any kind of concrete proof. But logically, they have three similar articles. The first one according to their timestamp is very short. The next one according to their timestamp is basically the same as the first with additions, and the 3rd according to their timestamps is basically the second one with yet still more additions. It is logical that as more information, whether contrived or otherwise, becomes available that the articles would follow such a path. It would be illogical that the article would get shorter as more information became available.

Of course considering the publisher claims to have interviewed a dead person, its obvious we're talking about illogical people here, or just simply idiots, which would equate to illogical...

You would think that if they were going to bother to change the timestamps, they'd also take out the interview with the walking dead...

This all makes me wonder how much common sense exist HERE on this site...

"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence