Comment: How would this be the smoking gun even if it were true?

(See in situ)


How would this be the smoking gun even if it were true?

Maybe you weren't trying to deceive people and you actually think the name always stays the same or maybe you were just stirring the pot a little bit, it really doesn't even matter. There are several legitimate questions that have been raised about this case and several easily dismissed bits of garbage that people who want real answers, or at least claim to, seem to cling to more than facts.
It's like the press conference of the coroner; all the citizen journalists cut out the question about a tent because the guy said "magnificent" in a funny way that could be spun to support their own narrative. If truth is what you seek, than truth is what you must deliver.
It's ok to be wrong and move on, it's not ok to cling to being wrong to save face.