Comment: Obama is better for liberty than any challenger would have been.

(See in situ)


Obama is better for liberty than any challenger would have been.

Because liberty is the child of tyranny we're better off with Obama. Romney would have been eligible for reelection in 4 years which would have forced him to slow down the march to tyranny, delaying the inevitable and buying 4 more years time for the acclimation of the general public.

However, Obama is free now to get on the fast-track to the 'clamp-down', which will fail, ushering in what Gerald Celente called a New American Renaissance.

The sooner this happens the better. Obama, please keep doing what you're doing.

Defeat the panda-industrial complex

I am dusk icon. anagram me.