Comment: Apples and oranges

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: It does not "logically follow". (see in situ)

Apples and oranges

The point isn't whether you have a right to partake of another's money (offered salvation) without his permission, it's that his claim of "selfless sacrifice" is bogus because his rules entail joining a religion with himself as your God and if you don't accept, he promises to punish you with eternal condemnation. It's like telling someone you will torture and kill them if they don't agree with you, but it's very libertarian because you can freely choose whether to agree or not. It's not logical.