Comment: I agree with the OP wholeheartedly!!!

Free speech that you agree with needs no protection, which is rather obvious and self-evident. Who in their right mind would possibly try to silence speech that they agree with. The idea is nonsensical!!!

Because of this basic, elementary, and self-evident fact, the "right to free speech" necessarily applies ONLY to speech that others disagree with.

Piers Morgan is also on the wrong side of the guns debate because he makes the same mistake in logic.

The 2nd amendment doesn't apply to the gov'ts guns. It protects the right of THOSE THAT DISAGREE WITH THE GOV'T to arm themselves. The Gov't doesn't need an amendment to protect it's guns from itself....

...and it has no need to silence those that agree with it, LMAO!!!

Privileges can be awarded, revoked, exchanged, etc. However, a rights, by the very definition of the word, is UNIVERSAL, without exception.

Please don't try to convert my 1st amendment rights, OR my 2nd amendment rights to mere privileges..... Or any other human rights, for that matter.

Piers Morgan, run your mouth all you want, you bloody ignorant bloke!!!