I was not arguing whether God existed or not.
I pointed out to an ATHEIST, who BY DEFINITION, does not believe in God, then logically, there would be an EQUAL PROBABILITY (i.e. ZERO) of God being EITHER Loving and Benevolant OR a "Brutal Authoritarian". For an atheist, it is LOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for God to be more one than the other.
Yet, the atheist, fatlibertarian, chose to make a divisive post about "What if God were a Brutal Authoritarian?"
My question is WHY would he choose to do that, because to him, logically, God MUST have a PRECISELY EQUAL CHANCE of being loving and benevolent.
But he chose to post something divisive ON PURPOSE. The question is WHY?
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: