Comment: Good article, but I'm not sure her premise is correct

(See in situ)


Good article, but I'm not sure her premise is correct

To quote the article "the nation's attention is riveted on what could have been done to prevent such a massacre". That's not exactly correct, at least not with the MSM or the Feinstein bill. The attention has been focused on a gun control bill to further degrade the 2nd amendment. As I understand the proposed Feinstein bill, if it was in law before the event, it would not have changed anything. CT already had gun control laws and the gun was essentially stolen. So Ann starts with a false premise. I have heard nothing about alternatives from the MSM as to what would have prevented this, other than their attack on the obvious, school staff with a CCW permit. I have heard nothing about bullet proof double security doors with closed circuit video, banks have them, staff with tazers and bear spray. The whole argument has been twisted into an agenda to pass a gun law and that would not prevent these attacks.