I enjoyed the easiness of the presentation! I have even finished chapter 5 and skipped to the end of the book to see what present dangers were discussed back in 1958.
I have no way of knowing truth from error. I have such a poor study of history. My husband has a degree in history. He pretty much sticks to the company line.
I am wondering, do you think Tom Woods has a valid grasp? I considered taking his courses earlier this (I mean last) year and have yet to do it. I am more interested in history than I have ever been as it seems to hold the keys to the present.
Also, do you think I am completely off base in pointing out that Patrick Henry was opposed to the US Constitution?
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on t