For example, if the mother or baby were identified in an at-risk population, that's one thing.
However, if a regular person, who otherwise would have NO REASON to otherwise ever have been exposed to B or D, what is the probability of viral infection?
How can you justify mandatory vaccination for this vaccine when the epidemiology shows a 1/100,000 or LESS rate of infection in non-at-risk populations?
I'm sorry, but it's completely inconsistent with any concept of liberty.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: