 |  |
Dedicated to restoring Constitutional government to the United States of America
Most Viewed
by signed in DPers this minute
14 Frequencies Observed on Intellicast Radar Before Oklahoma Tornadoes10 Is an Obama Impeachment around the corner?6 Associated Press chief starts to sound like Alex Jones: 'Government is unconstitutional...'6 "Astoundingly Disturbing": Obama Administration Claims Power to Wage Endless War Across the Globe6 C-SPAN on IRS targeting of us.
more
User login
Top Recent Topics
Active Forum Topics
 |
 |
 |
Recent Comments
# If anyone can
by uastudy
4 sec ago
4 sec ago
# My guess....
Zero
by thelastbill
16 sec ago
16 sec ago
# Abolish the IRS
by legalizeliberty
33 sec ago
33 sec ago
# How many other DP'ers out there
by aerograd
1 min 3 sec ago
1 min 3 sec ago
# March for progress, one step at a time
by Klaus7
4 min 5 sec ago
4 min 5 sec ago
# I picked up on that too.
by Johny-Boy
5 min 19 sec ago
5 min 19 sec ago
# Good points my friend
by legalizeliberty
5 min 41 sec ago
5 min 41 sec ago
# LOL, if they used sound
by dacaman12
7 min 22 sec ago
7 min 22 sec ago
# It's not like we're talking about those mostly fraudulent
by JohnPhillipSousa
7 min 26 sec ago
7 min 26 sec ago
# Don't use the voting feature
by ramicio
8 min 57 sec ago
8 min 57 sec ago
# i like the spirit of this
by gomez
9 min 33 sec ago
9 min 33 sec ago
# Translation:
"Due to our
by SuspiciousFish
9 min 41 sec ago
9 min 41 sec ago
# Judge Napolitano is so articulate!
by dormouse
10 min 42 sec ago
10 min 42 sec ago
# I appreciate
by uastudy
11 min 52 sec ago
11 min 52 sec ago
# I wish this guy would run for President
by Ira Freeman
12 min 31 sec ago
12 min 31 sec ago
# Thanks for adding the second video
by dormouse
12 min 33 sec ago
12 min 33 sec ago
# + 1
by legalizeliberty
13 min 28 sec ago
13 min 28 sec ago
# Ministry of truth...
by relocatedtocanada
13 min 36 sec ago
13 min 36 sec ago
# Some of his supporters are previous ron paul supporters
by Joeson98765
11 min 12 sec ago
11 min 12 sec ago
Who's Online
163 users currently online.
1,021 users signed in today.
48,763 guest views today.
- Brazil4Paul
- tasmlab
- R-Hal CT
- Steadfast
- RobWalsh
- freespeech468
- Micah68
- ralph hornsby
- babybear
- wolfe
- libertech
- Velveeta Underground
- ProudAmericanFirst
- Mark Twain
- GoodSamaritan
- Johny-Boy
- Musicians and Hotties for Ron Paul 2016
- President Paul or Bust
- Ira Freeman
- Scott Gray
- seamusin
- PatriotsUnderGod
- Lao Tzua
- b
- jackdacosta
- JohnPhillipSousa
- legalizeliberty
- mwiegand
- Joη
- Shootist
- rblauvelt
- PattyC
- JackieK
- i_am_free
- eeeewidner
- gomez
- LukeO
- EGhost57
- TJV123
- Peaceful_Patriot
- base1aransas
- Faithkills
- aerograd
- No1ButPaul
- LastStraw
- thelastbill
- TheLorax
- ThisIsForFreedom
- Rick Stone
- nordlund.e
Comment: You are completely ignoring the epidemiology.
You are completely ignoring the epidemiology.
For example, if the mother or baby were identified in an at-risk population, that's one thing.
However, if a regular person, who otherwise would have NO REASON to otherwise ever have been exposed to B or D, what is the probability of viral infection?
1%?
.1%?
.01%?
.001%
.0001%
.00001%
.000001%
How can you justify mandatory vaccination for this vaccine when the epidemiology shows a 1/100,000 or LESS rate of infection in non-at-risk populations?
I'm sorry, but it's completely inconsistent with any concept of liberty.